1.1. The Beauty of Electricity
“Electricity and
magnetism is all around us. We have electric lights, Electric clocks. We have
microphones, calculators, televisions, VCRs, radio, computers. Light itself is
an electromagnetic phenomenon as radio waves are. The colors of the rainbow in
the blue sky are there because of electricity. Cars, planes, trains can only
run because of electricity. Horses need electricity because muscle contractions
require electricity. Your nerve system is driven by electricity. Atoms,
molecule, all chemical reactions exist because of electricity.
You could not see
without electricity. Your heart would not beat without electricity. And you could
not even think without electricity, though I realize that even with electricity
some of you may have a problem with that.“ [Walter Lewin]
1.2. Modern model of atom
Figure 1.1 – Modern Picture of Atom
Table 1.1 - Property of an atom
Neutron
|
Proton
|
Electron
|
|
Diameter size (m)
|
1.2×10-15
|
5×10-11 to 5×10-10
|
|
Mass (kg)
|
1.675×10-27
|
1.673×10-27
|
9.109×10-31
|
1.3. History of electricity
Electron, name from a Greek word, means amber. As reported
by the ancient Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus around 600 BC, it was known
that if we rub amber that it can attract light objects such as pieces of dry
leaves and hair. So that's where electricity got its name from.
In the sev-sixteenth century there were more substances
known to do this, for instance glass and sulfur. And it was also known and
written that when people were bored at parties that the women would rub their
amber jewelry and would touch frogs. The frogs would start jumping of
desperation, which people considered to be fun, but they not understanding what
actually was happening to the amber nor what was happening to the frogs.
In 1733, C. F. du Fay proposed two varieties of electricity
that cancel each other, and expressed this in terms of a two-fluid theory. When
glass was rubbed with silk, du Fay said that the glass was charged with
vitreous electricity, and, when amber was rubbed with fur, the amber was said
to be charged with resinous electricity. Let's call one A and the other B. It
was known that A repels A and B repels B but A attracts B.
Still in the eighteenth century, it was Benjamin Franklin
without any knowledge of electrons and protons who introduced the idea that all
substances are penetrated with what he called electric fluid, electric fire.
And he stated if we get too much of the fire then we are positively charged and
if we have a deficiency of that fire, then we are negatively charged. He
introduced the sign convention and he decided that if we rub glass that that is
an excess of fire and he called that therefore positive.
We will see later that why this choice he had fifty percent chance
is extremely unfortunate but we have to live with it. So if we take this fluid
according to Benjamin Franklin and bring it from one substance to the other,
then the one that gets an excess becomes positively charged. Automatically as a
consequence of that the one - from which we take the fluid - becomes negatively
charged.
1.4. Electric charge
Charge is an intrinsic property of partikel or matter. Charge
have been quantized and comes in multiples of individual small units called the
elementary charge, e, approximately
equal to 1.602×10−19 Coulombs. The proton has a charge of e, and the electron has a charge of –e.
A neutral atom has same number of electron and proton, so
the charge is 0. If we take one electron off, the atom will become a positive
ion. If we add an electron then, the atom will become a negative ion. Remember,
we can't add or taking off a proton from an atom.
The electric charge is a fundamental conserved property of
some subatomic particles. This is the same as the idea of Benjamin Franklin. We
can't create charge. If we create plus then we automatically create minus.
1.4.1. Electric charging
The question is “how can we
manipulate or engineering the electricity?”
That because we are able to
separate positive and negative charge from each other. This process called
charging and there are three methods to do that.
1.4.1.1. Friction
From the history above, people has
been known that friction can produce positive and negative charge. Charging by
friction can happen since the two objects are made of different materials, so
their atoms bounded their electrons with different strengths. As they pass over
each other the electrons with weaker bonds are “ripped” off of that material
and collect on the other material.
1.4.1.2. Conduction
Charging by conduction is also
called by contact. The principle is when we contact a neutral material with a
charged material, the electron will be transfered and neutral material
will become a charge material. But even if the material not make a contact and
just close enough to let the electron jump from one material to another
material, that is also conduction
With conduction we will get the
same type of charge. So, If we conduct with positive charged, we will get a
positive material. And if we conduct with negative charge we will get a
negative material.
1.4.1.3. Induction
We can also charging a material
without contact or transfer of electron. This prosses called induction. As in
conduction, type of material will determine the behavior of induction.
1.4.2. Electric charge behavior
As we know before, same type of
charge will repel each other, and different type of charge will attract each other. But, do
you know, what it is that makes us easy to charging or not?? The answer is the
type of material. There are two type of material based on it’s electrical
property.
1.4.2.1. Conductor
Conductor materials have moveble
electrons, so, it is easy for the electron to move from one atom to another
atom. Electrons of conductor material will move when an electric potential
difference (measured in volts) is applied across separate points on the
material.
Because of easy movement
electron, it is easy to charging the conductor material by conduction method.
The opposite, it is more complex process to charging the conductor material
with induction method.
Figure 1.2 – Conduction
and induction of conductor material
1.4.2.2. Insulator or non-conductor
The electrons of insulator
material are tightly bound and localized in direction of chemical bounding. So,
it is hard for the electron to move from one atom to another atom. Perferct
insulator does not respond to an electric field and completely resists the flow
of electric charge. But in real, there is no perfect insulator, so almost of
the material are semiconductor material.
In practice, the insulator can be
polarized by an applied electric field, and it called dielectric material. When
a dielectric is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow
through the material as they do in a conductor, but only slightly shift from
their average equilibrium positions causing dielectric polarization. Therefore,
dielectric materials with high dielectric constants (not easy to polarized)
such as glass, paper or Teflon are considered as good electrical insulators.
Dielectric property makes easy to
charging non conductor material by induction method. Rather than that, it is
more complex process to charging the insulator material with conduction method
due to only the specific areas that actually touched would show any change in charge.
Figure 1.3 – Conduction and
induction of insulator material
1.4.2.3. Spark phenomenon
An electric spark is a type of
electrostatic discharge that occurs when an electric field with strength
exceeds the dielectric field strength of air. This exceeded field strength
causes an increase in the number of free electrons and ions in the air and
temporarily causing the air to become an ionized
electrically conductive channel. This process producing a brief emission of
light and sound, and that usually we call spark.
Electric sparks occur in or near
many man-made objects. Some of them are small and some of them are large. Sometimes
it can happen by accident, and sometime it is by design. Lightning is an
example of an electric spark in nature. A continuous discharge of electric
current through a gas is an electric arc.
1.4.3. Conservation of charge
The total electric charge of an
isolated system remains constant regardless of changes within the system
itself. Charge cannot be created. If we create plus then automatically we
create minus. This law is inherent to all processes known to physics and can be
derived in a local form from gauge invariance of the wave function. The
conservation of charge results in the charge-current continuity equation. More
generally, the net change in charge density ρ
within a volume of integration V is
equal to the area integral over the current density J through the closed surface S
= ∂V, which is in turn equal to the
net current I:
|
Thus, the conservation of electric charge, as expressed by the continuity equation, gives the result:
The charge transferred between times ti and tf is obtained by integrating both sides:
where I is the net outward current through a closed surface and Q is the electric charge contained
within the volume defined by the surface.
1.4.4. Electroscope - a principle to measure charge
We will use various instruments to
measure charge in a quantitative way and one of the instruments that is very
simple, is called an electroscope. In general it is just a conducting rod (such
as aluminum, metal) with two pieces of tinsel at the end. The pieces of tinsel
usually from aluminum foil. And often there is a nice knob, so if we touch or
bring near enough to knob with a charged object, then because the rod is conductor,
this can conduct the charges.
If we touch it with an object which
is positively charged, then this electroscop will become positively charged. If
I touch it with an object which is negatively charged it will become negatively
charged. If we induce the knob with positive charged, the knob will become
negative charged and the the pieces of tinsel will become positive charged. At
the end, we will see that the two very light pieces of aluminum foil will repel
each other and shows a certain angle, and the more charge there is the larger
that angle.
Figure 1.4 – Electroscope and
example of measurement
1.5. Electric force
It was Charles Augustin de Coulomb, French physicist, who
did a lot of research on this in the nineteenth, eighteenth century actually.
He found a special relationship between two charges. It was first published in
1785 and was essential to the development of the theory of electromagnetism.
Before it was published, other researchers have been insights into aspects of
Coulomb's law. In 1767, Joseph Priestley of England conjectured that the force
between charges varied as the inverse square of the distance.
Coulomb's law or Coulomb's inverse-square law is a law of
physics describing the electrostatic interaction between electrically charged
particles. Coulomb found that the force is proportional to the product of the
two charges, times a constant, which nowadays we call Coulomb's constant, K,
and then divided by the distance between these charges squared.
Now let's try a little bit more quantitative. If we take two
charges and we use for charges the symbol q1
and q2. They are separated
by a distance, r, and the unit vector
in the direction from one to two that we called r roof 1,2. (The roof stands for unit vector). If these
charges are equal, both minus or both plus, then charges will repel each other.
The F1,2 is the force on two due to number one. Since action equals
to minus reaction, force F2,1 is equal to F1,2 in
magnitude but a hundred eighty degrees, or it is in opposite direction.
Figure 1.5 – Electric
force between two charges
Where:
q= charge [Coulomb]
r = distance [m]
1.5.1. Superposition
If there is three or more charge,
we can use the superposition principal. In other time we will discuss about
that.
1.5.2. Electricity force vs gravitational force vs nuclear force
Look at what Joseph Priestley found
and see equation (1-1), I suddenly remember to the Newton law’s of gravitation.
Figure 1.6 – Gravitational force
between two mass
Where:
m = mass [kg]
r = distance [m]
m = mass [kg]
r = distance [m]
G = gravitational contant [Nm2/kg2]
= 6.674 × 10-11 [Nm2/coulomb2]
And if we compare electricity &
magnetism with mechanical, thereby comparing electricity with gravity, we will
see that electric forces are way more powerful than gravitational force. Let’s
see that is by taking two protons which are a distance D apart. As they have
the same charged, they will repel each other, because of electric force. Remember
of Table 1.1, we know that the proton have mass. Because gravity always attract
each other, so it will become force that opposite to the electric. Now, the
question is “which one is more powerfull?”
Figure 1.7 – Example of force
acting on protons
From the result above, we found
that the electric force is thirty-six orders of magnitude more potent than the
gravitational attraction. If these were the only forces that acted on the
protons and you bring them in the nucleus, which has a size of only ten to the
minus fourteen meters, then the acceleration that the proton will experience is
the electric force divided by the mass of the proton. If there is two protons
in an atom, then the electric force that repel the protons each other have
ratio about twenty-six order of magnitude higher than the gravitational
acceleration on earth.
As we know the gravitational
attraction is thirty-six order of magnitude lower than repelled of electric
force, ‘what kind of force that holds nucleus together?’ There must be such a
tremendous force on these protons. Well, the answer is the nuclear forces that
holding them together. We will not discuss about nuclear force on this topic,
so, just leave it alone for now.
So what holds our world together?
Well …. :
i)
On the nucleus scale (about 10-14m), nuclear
force are very important.
ii)
On an atomic scale up to thousands of
kilometers, it's electric forces that hold our world together.
iii)
But on a much larger scale, planets and stars
and the galaxy, it is gravity that dictate the behavior of the universe.
After we know about that, we may
say, “That's very inconsistent with what we have learned in Figure 1.7!” Yes,
however, most objects are neutral or very close to neutral and so if you take
the earth it is very unlikely even that the earth as a whole would have a charge
of more than ten coulombs (that probably is already an exaggeration). So, if we
put the earth with ten coulombs and then we put minus ten coulombs, so they
will attract each other, but given their distance, it's almost nothing. The electric
force on that scale is negligibly small. But of course, at that scale, the
force of gravity wins, because of their massive masses.
In this particular case, which we
take the earth and the moon, the gravitational force wins over the electric
force by twenty-five orders of magnitude. So even though our immediate
surroundings are dominated by electric forces, including our own body for that
matter, the behavior of the universe on a large scale is dictated by gravity.
Bibliography
Charging. (n.d.). Retrieved April 17, 2012, from
www.studyphysics.ca: http://www.studyphysics.ca/30/charging.pdf
Conductors
Insulators and Induced Charged.
(n.d.). Retrieved April 17, 2012, from physics.unl.edu: http://physics.unl.edu/~cbinek/Unit_2%20conductors%20insulators%20and%20induced%20charges.pptx
Coulomb's law. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2012, from en.wikipedia.org:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law
Dielectric. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2012, from
en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric
Electric charge. (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2012, from
en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge
Electric Spark. (n.d.). Retrieved April 17, 2012, from
en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_spark
Electrical conductor. (n.d.). Retrieved April 17, 2012, from
en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_conductor
Ganderton. (n.d.). What
is the charge and location and mass of a proton and a neutron and an electron
in the atom? (JEK, Editor) Retrieved April 15, 2012, from wiki.answers.com:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_charge_and_location_and_mass_of_a_proton_and_a_neutron_and_an_electron_in_the_atom
Insulator
(electricity). (n.d.). Retrieved
April 17, 2012, from en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_insulation
Newton's law of
universal gravitation. (n.d.).
Retrieved April 19, 2012, from en.wikipedia.org: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation
Lewin, Walter, 8.02
Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 (Massachusetts Institute of
Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare). http://ocw.mit.edu
(accessed April 19, 2012). License: Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike.
********THANK to GOD*******